A federal judge ordered multiple government agencies, including Veterans Affairs, Treasury and the USDA, to offer fired probationary federal workers their jobs back

Federal Judge Orders Rehiring of Thousands of Fired Government Workers

A federal judge has ordered multiple agencies to reinstate tens of thousands of probationary employees who were dismissed during President Donald Trump’s aggressive push to shrink the federal workforce.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup condemned the mass firings as a “sham” orchestrated by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to bypass legal workforce reduction procedures.

Agencies Ordered to Reinstate Fired Employees

Alsup’s ruling requires the Defense, Treasury, Energy, Interior, Agriculture, and Veterans Affairs Departments to immediately rehire all affected workers. He determined that OPM’s decision to terminate them was unlawful.

However, the ruling does not prevent the government from reducing its workforce—Alsup emphasized that agencies retain the authority to conduct reductions in force (RIFs) as long as they follow legal procedures. Federal agencies are currently finalizing RIF plans.

Judge Slams Government’s Handling of the Case

Alsup harshly criticized the Justice Department, accusing Trump administration lawyers of withholding critical information about who directed the mass terminations.

  • “You will not bring the people in here to be cross-examined. You’re afraid to do so because you know cross-examination would reveal the truth,” Alsup said to a DOJ attorney.
  • “I tend to doubt that you’re telling me the truth. … I’m tired of seeing you stonewall on trying to get at the truth.”

Alsup also blasted the administration for attempting to circumvent federal laws by falsely attributing the firings to poor performance instead of layoffs. He called the move “a gimmick”.

  • “It is a sad day when our government would fire a good employee and say it was based on performance when they know good and well that’s a lie,” he said.

A Broader Fight Over Federal Job Cuts

The ruling follows an earlier temporary reinstatement of 5,000 USDA employees by a federal civil service board, but Alsup’s decision marks the first court-ordered reversal of Trump’s widespread federal job cuts.

  • Alsup clarified that his ruling does not prohibit Trump’s administration from downsizing agencies—only that the proper legal process must be followed.
  • “The words I give you today should not be taken as some wild-and-crazy judge in San Francisco saying an administration cannot engage in a reduction in force,” he said. “It can be done—if it’s done in accordance with the law.”

Concerns Over Trump’s Efforts to Weaken Federal Workplace Protections

Alsup also raised concerns about Trump’s attempts to remove members of the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Federal Labor Relations Authority, which oversee federal employment issues.

  • The administration argued that fired employees should seek relief from these agencies.
  • Alsup questioned whether Trump’s efforts to undermine these boards had rendered them incapable of addressing the mass terminations.

Government’s Refusal to Provide Key Testimony

Alsup had ordered Charles Ezell, the acting head of OPM, to testify about his role in the firings, but the Justice Department refused, even withdrawing Ezell’s sworn declaration from the case.

  • At one point, Alsup reprimanded Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelsey Helland for the government’s lack of transparency:
    • “You’re not helping me get at the truth. You’re giving me press releases, sham documents.”
    • “I’m getting mad at you and I shouldn’t. You’re trying to do your best, and I apologize.”

Helland, the only government lawyer present, defended the administration’s actions, arguing that the firings were driven by Trump’s policy agenda, not OPM directives.

tastytrade logo+
Get the best broker for options trading and earn Unusual Whales discounted! in cash with an eligible account deposit at tastytrade. Get an Unusual Whales bonus when you deposit $2000. Offer expires 3/31/25. Certain restrictions, terms and conditions apply.
Unusual Whales does not confirm the information's truthfulness or accuracy of the associated references, data, and cannot verify any of the information. Any content on this site or related pages are not intended to provide legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Unusual Whales Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) or any state securities regulatory authority. Nothing on Unusual Whales should be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by Unusual Whales or any third party. Options, investing, trading is risky, and losses are more expected than profits. Please do own research before investing. Please only subscribe after reading our full terms and understanding options and the market, and the inherent risks of trading. It is highly recommended not to trade on this, or any, information from Unusual Whales. Markets are risky, and you will likely lose some or all of your capital. Please check our terms for full details.
Any content on this site or related pages are not intended to provide legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Unusual Whales Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) or any state securities regulatory authority. Nothing on Unusual Whales should be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by Unusual Whales or any third party. Certain investment planning tools available on Unusual Whales may provide general investment education based on your input. You are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, investment strategy, security or related transaction is appropriate for you based on your personal investment objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance. You should consult your legal or tax professional regarding your specific situation. See terms for more information.