Quantum computing could break bitcoin-like encryption far easier than intially thought, Google, GOOGL, researcher says

A new research paper by Google Quantum AI scientist Craig Gidney suggests that cracking widely used RSA encryption may require 20 times fewer quantum resources than previously thought.

Although the study does not specifically mention bitcoin (BTC) or other cryptocurrencies, it targets encryption techniques that underpin the security of crypto wallets and, in some cases, transaction systems.

RSA, a public-key encryption system, is commonly used for securing data transmission. It uses a pair of linked keys: a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption.

While bitcoin itself doesn’t rely on RSA, it uses elliptic curve cryptography (ECC)—another form of public-key encryption that, like RSA, is vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm. This quantum algorithm is capable of factoring large integers and solving discrete logarithm problems, which are the foundation of modern cryptographic systems.

ECC secures data by using mathematical curves instead of massive numbers, allowing for shorter keys with equivalent security strength. But while ECC keys, such as 256-bit ones, are more secure than 2048-bit RSA keys, advances in quantum computing pose non-linear scaling threats—meaning breakthroughs could drastically reduce the timeline for viable attacks.

“I estimate that a 2048-bit RSA integer could be factored in under a week by a quantum computer with fewer than one million noisy qubits,” Gidney wrote. This is a significant revision from his 2019 estimate, which required 20 million qubits and projected an eight-hour runtime.

It’s important to note that no such quantum machine currently exists. IBM’s most advanced quantum processor, Condor, has just over 1,100 qubits, while Google’s Sycamore has 53.

Quantum computers use quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously due to principles like superposition and entanglement. This allows quantum machines to perform many calculations in parallel, enabling solutions to problems that classical computers can’t efficiently handle.

“This is a 20-fold decrease in the number of qubits from our previous estimate,” Gidney noted in a post. A 20x efficiency gain in breaking RSA may signal future implications for ECC as well.

Unusual Whales does not confirm the information's truthfulness or accuracy of the associated references, data, and cannot verify any of the information. Any content on this site or related pages are not intended to provide legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Unusual Whales Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) or any state securities regulatory authority. Nothing on Unusual Whales should be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by Unusual Whales or any third party. Options, investing, trading is risky, and losses are more expected than profits. Please do own research before investing. Please only subscribe after reading our full terms and understanding options and the market, and the inherent risks of trading. It is highly recommended not to trade on this, or any, information from Unusual Whales. Markets are risky, and you will likely lose some or all of your capital. Please check our terms for full details.
Any content on this site or related pages are not intended to provide legal, tax, investment or insurance advice. Unusual Whales Inc. is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) or any state securities regulatory authority. Nothing on Unusual Whales should be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by Unusual Whales or any third party. Certain investment planning tools available on Unusual Whales may provide general investment education based on your input. You are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, investment strategy, security or related transaction is appropriate for you based on your personal investment objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance. You should consult your legal or tax professional regarding your specific situation. See terms for more information.